|
||||
|
||||
UC Berkeley's Tebtunis Papyrus 693: fragment of Sophocles 'Inachus' |
|
RETURN TO HOME PAGE |
PLEASE READ THROUGH THIS CAREFULLY... I do not apply mechanical or formulaic criteria when assessing papers - but I do expect your paper to be written to the high standards appropriate for students attending UC Berkeley...
Write a paper around six to seven pages in length, on a topic of your choice (to be discussed with me), the subject to be one of central interest and significance for the study of Greek Myth.
3. Choosing your topic Please think carefully about what you want to write on. Your topic should come from your own reading and thinking, and should be on a subject that you really want to write about; it should come from a passion, or interest, or concern that you develop in the course of studying Greek mythology. Your topic may be broad or specific, and it may draw on any area of knowledge, expertise or interest that you have (history, literature, philosophy, art, science, language etc. etc.) so long as the focus of the paper itself is clearly ancient Greek myth. Even though I will not be handing out a set list of topics to choose from, everyone is required to check in with me to report the topic they have chosen and to discuss it. I will give you guidance and advice as needed. If you have difficulty choosing or deciding on a topic, please come and see me to discuss things. On no account put off (let alone omit) writing the paper: I must have a satisfactory, completed paper on record in order to assign a Final Grade for the course at the end of term. 4. Formal requirementsI do not have uniform formulaic requirements for style, form etc. for this paper: nor do I have a set minimum number of references or footnotes, or minimum number of bibliographical references or citations which you will be penalised for not meeting. I also do not specify a single stylistic system to follow, or uniform document formatting requirements (margins, font size etc.). HOWEVER: you are expected to use your common sense and present a paper which is written to a high standard of English (including grammar, syntax, spelling, and general style), is clearly formatted and presented, is well organised, is internally consistent, and which uses citation, footnotes and bibliographical referencing as appropriate to the topic and as appropriate for a serious piece of independent work of quality presented by a student at the University of California. If you wish to adopt one specific convention (the Chicago Manual of Style, the MLA etc.) you may do so. Please do not use any 'tricks' to make your paper appear more substantial, or longer, than it actually is! I.e. no extra-'double-spacing', super-wide margins, extra-large fonts etc..... (Remember, I've been an undergraduate myself, been there and done all that..... :-) 5. Due date Papers are due by the last day of the Session, Friday 15 August at the latest. You are also welcome to hand in your paper before August 15 (earlier that week, or at the final exam on Thursday 14), if you finish it sooner. 6. Plagiarism, citation etc. Plagiarism and cheating are extremely serious offences and will not be tolerated in any shape or form in this course. The penalties are severe and include an automatic F grade for the piece of work containing plagiarism and notification of the incident to the Office of Student Judicial Affairs (which keeps records of all such incidents). In the case of a plagiarising paper an F may also be given as the final grade for the course.
What is plagiarism? Here is how the College of Letters and Science defines it: "All written work submitted for a course, except for acknowledged quotations, must be expressed in the student's own words. It must also be constructed upon a plan of the student's own devising. Work copied without acknowledgement from a book, from another student's paper, from the internet, or from any other source is plagiarized. Plagiarism can range from wholesale copying of passages from another's work to using the views, opinions, and insights of another without acknowledgement, to paraphrasing another person's original phrases without acknowledgement." Here is the relevant paragraph from the General Catalog: "Cheating or Plagiarism. Achievement and proficiency in subject matter include your realization that neither is to be achieved by cheating. An instructor has the right to give you an F on a single assignment produced by cheating without determining whether you have a passing knowledge of the relevant factual material. That is an appropriate academic evaluation for a failure to understand or abide by the basic rules of academic study and inquiry. An instructor has the right to assign a final grade of F for the course if you plagiarized a paper for a portion of the course, even if you have successfully and, presumably, honestly passed the remaining portion of the course. It must be understood that any student who knowingly aids in plagiarism or other cheating, e.g., allowing another student to copy a paper or examination question, is as guilty as the cheating student." If you are uncertain exactly what constitutes plagiarism, or how you should go about citing and referring to other people's work in your own papers and exams, please consult me. If you have any questions about anything - ask!
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
University of California, Berkeley Classics Department. Email: abulloch@berkeley.edu Send email to the Webmaster |
||||